
I give up, I really do… just when the fans were getting over the internal divisions presented by the fans who wanted transfer funds spent to reinforce the squad and those who decided that Arsene Wenger must not be questioned under any circumstances, Peter Hill-Wood decides to open his mouth. Thanks Peter! Even though I have warned everyone to avoid reading Tabloids and especially those from the Murdoch stable of publications, I see that he chose to answer questions from Steve Stammers of the Sunday Mirror. But when was the interview first given is my first question as some Journalists regurgitate old interviews as news. Anyway, what a timely way for the Tabloids to maintain the division at The Emirates. Is this some kind of media plot to destabilise our club or is there really some fire underneath these curls of smoke rising from Fleet Street?
Peter Hill-Wood is quoted as saying
"If somebody came and made a really huge bid then you cannot recommend shareholders turn it down because we don’t like it.
"We want the club the stay in its current ownership and, of course, you have some concern that someone will try to buy the club.
"The directors don’t want to sell but we are a public company. It depends on the price."
But wait….perhaps we do really need to listen to Peter Hill-Wood as upon this occasion something has clearly changed. Let us recall his position one year ago when he gave a pre AGM interview to the Daily Mail, Peter Hill-Wood is quoted as saying the following.
"We have always run Arsenal as a business and kept within reasonable bounds.
"All this nonsense about needing a billionaire to put a whole lot of money in to help shore up the annual deficit is not going to happen - it is lunacy."
The entire mindset of the Board was determined by the noises coming out of Red and White Holdings and the fall out from the split with David Dein. Arsenal supporters must now be somewhat concerned that if the Board is about to change tack, then all of the pain suffered through limited transfer funds etc was for nothing if we are prepared to sell our Heritage to the biggest bidder. But some financial pundits have whispered throughout this that eventually the dam would break under this tidal wave of money from foreign investors in the Premier League, and we had better be ready to consider our options.
Ok, I am not happy but from what I can read between the lines, is that before the buy out of Manchester City by the Abu Dhabi group worth some £556 Billion, it is alleged that Arsenal either in the form of Usmanov or perhaps the Board were approached before the deal with City, but the Group were unsuccessful. Now the talk is of more Arabian interest in the Premier League and that this is from the successful oil rich Saudi Family, The Al- Makhtoums who have revolutionised Horse Racing. The fit would be logical as the Arsenal stadium is called The Emirates and of course the Makhtoums are the family who rule Dubai of the United Arab Emirates. They also own the stadium sponsor’s Emirates Airlines. So in a sense, they are already involved with the club fortunes to an extent.
So, far from this being a rush of blood to the head, could this be more like a warning that after the clubs accounts are published, Arsenal will be ripe for a takeover? If so it would seem the Board could be faced with a possible hostile takeover from Usmanov once the intial lock down agreement ends in April of next year. The suggestion is that Stanley Kroenke will not have the financial muscle to outbid Usmanov. So we must look to others to defend us.
In which case this is not so much a gaff from our honourable bespectacled one, but a well timed call for help to the famous Arab Royal families. The wealth that is owned by these families would easily run a medium sized country. The UAE is the fifth largest economy in the living world. However the family that run Abu Dhabi has the richest city in the world. The Al- Nyahans, and according to my brief internet researches, despite being cousins these two families are not exactly bosom pals. Apparently 94% of the oil and gas reserves sit beneath Abu Dhabi, and yet everyone hears of Dubai and the Makhtoums.
Abu Dhabi has just established it’s own Airline Etihad Airways to rival The Emirates based just 90 miles away. Talk is gathering fast that the Arab families are in competition in terms of Global recognition and the product of football as established in the English Premier league would be an easy way of acquiring it.So if it is now about football enhancing the Royal Arab family recognition, then. Arsenal are the logical target, in not having the massive debts of Manchester United. Arsenal is a London based club being very well run would mean that the price of ownership would be lower. There would also be fewer tensions in having two Royal Families competing in the same city of Manchester.
If Arsenal had not given out this signal, and IF a takeover is really inevitable in the calculation of those who sit on the Board, then logically we could only have fallen into the clutches of Usmanov the biggest shareholder of the club. The recent surge in oil and gas prices, must mean that there are literally thousands of billions of pounds (Trillions) which are sitting around as extra cash doing nothing for these families. Those who recall me writing in an earlier blog that for ten seconds I had wanted The Abu Dhabi group to have bought Arsenal, then I came to my senses? Well now the unthinkable is fast becoming a choice between the Devil (Usmanov) and the deep blue sea (Arab Wealth). What should The Arsenal Board do if faced with those options?
Surely we should stick to our principles are remain independent? or is this an early sign that some signatories to the lock down agreement are weakening in their resolve? My call is for them to hold firm and not give away our precious heritage. But whether we like it or not Money talks, and the amount of money being speculated about is not so much loud talk as positively deafening…
Your comments are invited.
Fabregas the King.


































